Hang Vo
An empirical study of assurance in the UK government major projects portfolio: from data to recommendations, to action or inaction
Vo, Hang; Kirkham, Richard; Williams, Terry Mervyn; Howells, Amanda; Forster, Rick; Cooke-Davies, Terry
Authors
Richard Kirkham
Professor Terry Williams Terry.Williams@hull.ac.uk
Director of the Risk Institute
Amanda Howells
Rick Forster
Terry Cooke-Davies
Abstract
© 2020, Emerald Publishing Limited. Purpose: Effective and robust governance of major projects and programmes in the public sector is crucial to the accountability of the state and the transparency of state spending. The theoretical discourse on governance, in the context of projects and programmes, is not fully mature, although is now sufficiently well developed to warrant an increased scholarly focus on practice. This paper aims to contribute to the empirical literature through a study of assurance routines in the UK Government Major Projects Portfolio (GMPP). Design/methodology/approach: A framework analysis approach to the evaluation of a subset of GMPP database generates original insights into (1) the framing of assurance review recommendations, (2) the treatment of assurance review data and (3) the subsequent tracking of the implementation of actions arising from the assurance review process. Findings: The analysis reveals that the “delivery confidence” of the major projects and programmes included in this study improves during the time that they are assured on the GMPP. This would suggest that “enhanced” governance routines are desirable in programmes and projects that exhibit high degrees of complexity and scale. Originality/value: The research findings contribute to the wider conversations in this journal and elsewhere on project governance routines and governance-as-practice in the context of government and public services.
Citation
Vo, H., Kirkham, R., Williams, T. M., Howells, A., Forster, R., & Cooke-Davies, T. (2021). An empirical study of assurance in the UK government major projects portfolio: from data to recommendations, to action or inaction. International journal of managing projects in business, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2019-0242
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Sep 16, 2020 |
Online Publication Date | Jan 1, 2021 |
Publication Date | Jan 1, 2021 |
Deposit Date | Dec 3, 2020 |
Publicly Available Date | Jan 1, 2021 |
Journal | International Journal of Managing Projects in Business |
Print ISSN | 1753-8378 |
Publisher | Emerald |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2019-0242 |
Keywords | Project governance; Government projects; Governance structures; Lessons learned; Project-based learning |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3606174 |
Publisher URL | https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJMPB-10-2019-0242/full/html |
Files
Article
(2 Mb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
You might also like
Journal of the Operational Research Society (JORS): The last 40 years
(2023)
Journal Article
Conclusions
(2022)
Book Chapter
Project success
(2022)
Book Chapter
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search