Richard Hammersley
How to measure mood in nutrition research
Hammersley, Richard; Reid, Marie; Atkin, Stephen L.
Authors
Marie Reid
Stephen L. Atkin
Abstract
© 2014 The Authors. Mood is widely assessed in nutrition research, usually with rating scales. A core assumption is that positive mood reinforces ingestion, so it is important to measure mood well. Four relevant theoretical issues are reviewed: (i) the distinction between protracted and transient mood; (ii) the distinction between mood and emotion; (iii) the phenomenology of mood as an unstable tint to consciousness rather than a distinct state of consciousness; (iv) moods can be caused by social and cognitive processes as well as physiological ones. Consequently, mood is difficult to measure and mood rating is easily influenced by non-nutritive aspects of feeding, the psychological, social and physical environment where feeding occurs, and the nature of the rating system employed. Some of the difficulties are illustrated by reviewing experiments looking at the impact of food on mood. The mood-rating systems in common use in nutrition research are then reviewed, the requirements of a better mood-rating system are described, and guidelines are provided for a considered choice of mood-rating system including that assessment should: have two main dimensions; be brief; balance simplicity and comprehensiveness; be easy to use repeatedly. Also mood should be assessed only under conditions where cognitive biases have been considered and controlled.
Citation
Hammersley, R., Reid, M., & Atkin, S. L. (2014). How to measure mood in nutrition research. Nutrition research reviews, 27(2), 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422414000201
Acceptance Date | Sep 1, 2014 |
---|---|
Online Publication Date | Dec 4, 2014 |
Publication Date | 2014-12 |
Deposit Date | May 29, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | May 29, 2015 |
Journal | Nutrition research reviews |
Print ISSN | 0954-4224 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 27 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 284-294 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422414000201 |
Keywords | Affect; Mood assessment; Mood rating |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/374516 |
Publisher URL | http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9534876&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0954422414000201 |
Additional Information | Author's accepted manuscript of article published in: Nutrition research reviews, 2014, v.27, issue 2 |
Contract Date | May 29, 2015 |
Files
Article.pdf
(194 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2015 The authors. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder
You might also like
Drugs and Crime: Theories and Practices
(-0001)
Book
Aspartame sensitivity? : a double blind randomised crossover study
(2015)
Journal Article
Trauma in the childhood stories of people who have injected drugs
(2015)
Journal Article
Ranking the harm of non-medically used prescription opioids in the UK
(2015)
Journal Article
Managing eating disorder patients in primary care in the UK: A qualitative study
(2009)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search