Mr Sean Pymer Sean.Pymer@hull.ac.uk
Academic Clinical Exercise Physiologist
Mr Sean Pymer Sean.Pymer@hull.ac.uk
Academic Clinical Exercise Physiologist
Saed Ibeggazene
Joanne Palmer
Garry Tew
Lee Ingle
Mr George Smith George.Smith@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer
Professor Ian Chetter I.Chetter@hull.ac.uk
Professor of Vascular Surgery
Amy Harwood
Objectives: Supervised exercise programmes (SEP) are effective for improving walking distance in patients with intermittent claudication (IC) but provision and uptake rates are sub-optimal. Access to such programmes has also been halted by the Coronavirus pandemic. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence for home-based exercise programmes (HEP).
Data Sources: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched for terms relating to HEP and IC.
Review Methods: This review was conducted in according with the published protocol and PRISMA guidance. Randomised and non-randomised trials that compared a HEP to SEP, basic exercise advice or no exercise controls for IC were included. A narrative synthesis was provided for all studies and meta-analyses conducted using data from randomised trials. The primary outcome was maximal walking distance. Sub-group analyses were performed to consider the effect of monitoring. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool and quality of evidence via GRADE.
Results: 23 studies with 1907 participants were included. Considering the narrative review, HEPs were inferior to SEPs which was reflected in the meta-analysis (MD 139m, 95% CI 45 to 232m, p = .004, very-low-quality evidence). Monitoring was an important component, as HEPs adopting this were equivalent to SEPs (MD: 8m, 95% CI -81 to 97, p = .86; moderate-quality evidence). For HEPs versus basic exercise advice, narrative review suggested HEPs can be superior, though not always significantly so. For HEPs versus no exercise controls, narrative review and meta-analysis suggested HEPs were potentially superior (MD: 136m, -2-273m p = .05, very-low-quality evidence). Monitoring was also a key element in these comparisons.
Other elements such as appropriate frequency (≥3x a week), intensity (to moderate-maximum pain), duration (20 progressing to 60 minutes) and type (walking) of exercise were important, as was education, self-regulation, goal setting, feedback and action planning.
Pymer, S., Ibeggazene, S., Palmer, J., Tew, G., Ingle, L., Smith, G., Chetter, I., & Harwood, A. (2021). An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Home-based Exercise Programmes for Individuals with Intermittent Claudication. Journal of vascular surgery, 74(6), 2076-2085.e20
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Mar 26, 2021 |
Online Publication Date | Jun 2, 2021 |
Publication Date | 2021-12 |
Deposit Date | Mar 30, 2021 |
Publicly Available Date | Jun 3, 2022 |
Journal | Journal of vascular surgery |
Print ISSN | 0741-5214 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 74 |
Issue | 6 |
Pages | 2076-2085.e20 |
Keywords | Intermittent claudication; Peripheral arterial disease; Exercise; Walking |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3746329 |
Article
(223 Kb)
PDF
Publisher Licence URL
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Copyright Statement
©2021 Elsevier. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-N D 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search