Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Exam Preparation: Concerns of London Upper Secondary School Students with Implications for Teachers and Teaching

Minott, Mark A

Authors



Abstract

The aim of this qualitative case study was to ascertain factors impacting the examination preparation process and causing concerns for London upper secondary students, to learn steps taken to reduce and/or resolve the concerns, and to discuss the implications for teachers and teaching. A subsidiary yet important aim was to give the students a “voice” in the research literature. Using convenient or opportunity sampling, 14 Grade 12 and 13 students, ages 16–18 in a south-west London secondary school, were interviewed face-to-face. The analysis of the data revealed external factors and a personal need factor, that is the need to pass the exam, impacted the examination preparation process and caused concerns for students. Schools and students have use various solutions to reduce and/or resolve concerns. For example, school-based solutions included offering make-up or additional sessions or extra classes. Students—when faced with large amounts of material and information—employed solutions such as “things-to-do lists” and breaking down tasks into manageable sections. Implications for teachers and teaching include the need for teachers’ lesson contents to address factors impacting exam preparation and students’ concerns. Teachers also need to equip students to use a variety of revision strategies, encourage students to use social support and ensure that promised extra lessons materialize.

Citation

Minott, M. A. (2020). Exam Preparation: Concerns of London Upper Secondary School Students with Implications for Teachers and Teaching. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(1), 338-350. https://doi.org/10.5590/jerap.2020.10.1.21

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 27, 2020
Online Publication Date Oct 27, 2020
Publication Date 2020
Deposit Date Oct 14, 2022
Journal Journal of Educational Research and Practice
Print ISSN 2167-8693
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 10
Issue 1
Pages 338-350
DOI https://doi.org/10.5590/jerap.2020.10.1.21
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4094687
Related Public URLs https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/81766/