Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Key items for reports of primary care research: an international Delphi study

Sturgiss, Elizabeth Ann; Prathivadi, Pallavi; Phillips, William R.; Moriarty, Frank; Lucassen, Peter L B J; van der Wouden, Johannes C; Glasziou, Paul; Olde Hartman, Tim C; Orkin, Aaron; Reeve, Joanne; Russell, Grant; Van Weel, Chris

Authors

Elizabeth Ann Sturgiss

Pallavi Prathivadi

William R. Phillips

Frank Moriarty

Peter L B J Lucassen

Johannes C van der Wouden

Paul Glasziou

Tim C Olde Hartman

Aaron Orkin

Grant Russell

Chris Van Weel



Abstract

Objective Reporting guidelines can improve dissemination and application of findings and help avoid research waste. Recent studies reveal opportunities to improve primary care (PC) reporting. Despite increasing numbers of guidelines, none exists for PC research. This study aims to prioritise candidate reporting items to inform a reporting guideline for PC research. Design Delphi study conducted by the Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care (CRISP) Working Group. Setting International online survey. Participants Interdisciplinary PC researchers and research users. Main outcome measures We drew potential reporting items from literature review and a series of international, interdisciplinary surveys. Using an anonymous, online survey, we asked participants to vote on and whether each candidate item should be included, required or recommended in a PC research reporting guideline. Items advanced to the next Delphi round if they received>50% votes to include. Analysis used descriptive statistics plus synthesis of free-text responses. Results 98/116 respondents completed round 1 (84% response rate) and 89/98 completed round 2 (91%). Respondents included a variety of healthcare professions, research roles, levels of experience and all five world regions. Round 1 presented 29 potential items, and 25 moved into round 2 after rewording and combining items and adding 2 new items. A majority of round 2 respondents voted to include 23 items (90%-100% for 11 items, 80%-89% for 3 items, 70%-79% for 3 items, 60%-69% for 3 items and 50%-59% for 3 items). Conclusion Our Delphi study identified items to guide the reporting of PC research that has broad endorsement from the community of producers and users of PC research. We will now use these results to inform the final development of the CRISP guidance for reporting PC research.

Citation

Sturgiss, E. A., Prathivadi, P., Phillips, W. R., Moriarty, F., Lucassen, P. L. B. J., van der Wouden, J. C., …Van Weel, C. (2022). Key items for reports of primary care research: an international Delphi study. BMJ open, 12(12), Article e066564. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066564

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Oct 31, 2022
Online Publication Date Dec 19, 2022
Publication Date Dec 19, 2022
Deposit Date Oct 20, 2022
Publicly Available Date Jan 3, 2023
Journal BMJ Open
Print ISSN 2044-6055
Electronic ISSN 2044-6055
Publisher BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 12
Issue 12
Article Number e066564
DOI https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066564
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4100228

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations