A review of mentorship measurement tools

Chen, Yanhua; Watson, Roger; Hilton, Andrea

Abstract

© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. Objectives: To review mentorship measurement tools in various fields to inform nursing educators on selection, application, and developing of mentoring instruments. Design: A literature review informed by PRISMA 2009 guidelines. Data Sources: Six databases: CINHAL, Medline, PsycINFO, Academic Search Premier, ERIC, Business premier resource. Review Methods: Search terms and strategies used: mentor* N3 (behav* or skill? or role? or activit? or function* or relation*) and (scale or tool or instrument or questionnaire or inventory). The time limiter was set from January 1985 to June 2015. Extracted data were content of instruments, samples, psychometrics, theoretical framework, and utility. An integrative review method was used. Results: Twenty-eight papers linked to 22 scales were located, seven from business and industry, 11 from education, 3 from health science, and 1 focused on research mentoring. Mentorship measurement was pioneered by business with a universally accepted theoretical framework, i.e. career function and psychosocial function, and the trend of scale development is developing: from focusing on the positive side of mentorship shifting to negative mentoring experiences and challenges. Nursing educators mainly used instruments from business to assess mentorship among nursing teachers. In education and nursing, measurement has taken to a more specialised focus: researchers in different contexts have developed scales to measure different specific aspects of mentorship. Most tools show psychometric evidence of content homogeneity and construct validity but lack more comprehensive and advanced tests. Conclusion: Mentorship is widely used and conceptualised differently in different fields and is less mature in nursing than in business. Measurement of mentorship is heading to a more specialised and comprehensive process. Business and education provided measurement tools to nursing educators to assess mentorship among staff, but a robust instrument to measure nursing students' mentorship is needed.

Citation

Chen, Y., Watson, R., & Hilton, A. (2016). A review of mentorship measurement tools. Nurse education today, 40, 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.020

• Journal Article Type: Article
• Acceptance Date: Jan 26, 2016
• Online Publication Date: Feb 10, 2016
• Publication Date: 2016-05
• Deposit Date: Feb 22, 2016
• Publicly Available Date: Feb 22, 2016
• Journal: Nurse education today
• Print ISSN: 0260-6917
• Electronic ISSN: 1532-2793
• Publisher: Elsevier
• Peer Reviewed: Peer Reviewed
• Volume: 40
• Pages: 20-28
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.01.020
• Keywords: Nursing education; Mentor; Behaviour; Measurement tool; Theoretical framework; Psychometrics
• Public URL: https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/411123
• Publisher URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691716000472
• Additional Information: Authors' accepted manuscript of article published in: Nurse education today, 2016, v.40.
• Contract Date: Feb 22, 2016