Dr Matthew Northgraves M.Northgraves@hull.ac.uk
Clinical Trial Manager
The test-retest reliability of four functional mobility tests in apparently healthy adults
Northgraves, Matthew J.; Hayes, Stephen C.; Marshall, Philip; Madden, Leigh A.; Vince, Rebecca V.
Authors
Dr Steve Hayes S.Hayes@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Biomechanics & Strength and Conditioning
Mr Phil Marshall Phil.Marshall@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Strength & Conditioning
Dr Leigh Madden L.A.Madden@hull.ac.uk
Post-Doctoral Research Assistant
Dr Rebecca Vince Rebecca.Vince@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Health Physiology
Abstract
Background: Simple field tests are often used to assess functional mobility in clinical settings. Despite having many benefits, these tests are susceptible to measurement error and individual variation. Objectives: To examine the test-retest and absolute reliability of timed up and go test (TUG), five times sit-to-stand (FTSTS), stair climb test (SCT) and 6 minute walk (6MWT). Methods: Over two sessions, thirty-five subjects (30-74 years), repeated the five tests approximately four weeks apart. Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlations [ICC]) and absolute reliability (95% limit of agreements [95% LOA]; standard error of measurement [SEM] and minimum detectable change [MDC]) were calculated. Results: All five tests had high test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.95) although significant between session changes were present for the TUG and FTSTS (p < 0.05). FTSTS displayed the greatest measurement error whilst 95% LOA was the most conservative measure of absolute reliability. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the TUG, FTSTS, SCT and 6MWT are reliable when performed four weeks apart. Furthermore, the inclusion of SEM, MDC and 95% LOA provides reference values to aid in identifying changes over time above those of measurement error and individual variation.
Citation
Northgraves, M. J., Hayes, S. C., Marshall, P., Madden, L. A., & Vince, R. V. (2016). The test-retest reliability of four functional mobility tests in apparently healthy adults. Isokinetics and Exercise Science, 24(3), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.3233/ies-160614
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Feb 3, 2016 |
Publication Date | Aug 22, 2016 |
Deposit Date | Feb 24, 2016 |
Publicly Available Date | Aug 22, 2016 |
Journal | Isokinetics and exercise science |
Print ISSN | 0959-3020 |
Publisher | IOS Press |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 24 |
Issue | 3 |
Pages | 171-179 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.3233/ies-160614 |
Keywords | TUG; FTSTS; Stair climb; 6MWT |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/411326 |
Publisher URL | http://content.iospress.com/articles/isokinetics-and-exercise-science/ies614 |
Additional Information | Author's accepted manuscript of an article published in: Isokinetics and exercise science, 2016, v.24, issue 3 |
Contract Date | Feb 24, 2016 |
Files
Article.pdf
(680 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2016 University of Hull
You might also like
Brain and Lung Biomarker Responses to Hyperoxic Hypobaric Decompression
(2024)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search