Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Evidence for the reliability and validity, and some support for the practical utility of the two-factor Consideration of Future Consequences Scale-14

McKay, Michael T.; Perry, John L.; Percy, Andrew; Cole, Jon C.

Authors

Michael T. McKay

John L. Perry

Andrew Percy

Jon C. Cole



Abstract

Researchers have proposed 1-factor, 2-factor, and bifactor solutions to the 12-item Consideration of Future Consequences Scale (CFCS-12). In order to overcome some measurement problems and to create a robust and conceptually useful two-factor scale the CFCS-12 was recently modified to include two new items and to become the CFCS-14. Using a University sample, we tested four competing models for the CFCS-14: (a) a 12-item unidimensional model, (b) a model fitted for two uncorrelated factors (CFC-Immediate and CFC-Future), (c) a model fitted for two correlated factors (CFC-I and CFC-F), and (d) a bifactor model. Results suggested that the addition of the two new items has strengthened the viability of a two factor solution of the CFCS-14. Results of linear regression models suggest that the CFC-F factor is redundant. Further studies using alcohol and mental health indicators are required to test this redundancy.

Citation

McKay, M. T., Perry, J. L., Percy, A., & Cole, J. C. (2016). Evidence for the reliability and validity, and some support for the practical utility of the two-factor Consideration of Future Consequences Scale-14. Personality and individual differences, 98, 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.097

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 30, 2016
Online Publication Date Apr 13, 2016
Publication Date 2016-08
Deposit Date Jun 22, 2016
Publicly Available Date Apr 17, 2018
Journal Personality and individual differences
Print ISSN 0191-8869
Publisher Elsevier
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 98
Pages 133-136
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.097
Keywords Consideration of Future Consequences Scale; Exploratory structural equation modelling; Bifactor solution
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/440034
Publisher URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886916302501
Additional Information This is the accepted manuscript of an article published in Personality and individual differences, 2016. The version of record is available at the DOI link in this record.

Files





You might also like



Downloadable Citations