Asa Johannesen
Olfactory cue use by three-spined sticklebacks foraging in turbid water: prey detection or prey location?
Johannesen, Asa; Dunn, Alison M.; Morrell, Lesley J.
Authors
Alison M. Dunn
Professor Lesley Morrell L.Morrell@hull.ac.uk
Associate Dean, Education (Faculty of Science and Engineering)
Abstract
Foraging, when senses are limited to olfaction, is composed of two distinct stages: the detection of prey and the location of prey. While specialist olfactory foragers are able to locate prey using olfactory cues alone, this may not be the case for foragers that rely primarily on vision. Visual predators in aquatic systems may be faced with poor visual conditions such as natural or human-induced turbidity. The ability of visual predators to compensate for poor visual conditions by using other senses is not well understood, although it is widely accepted that primarily visual fish, such as three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus, can detect and use olfactory cues for a range of purposes. We investigated the ability of sticklebacks to detect the presence of prey and to locate prey precisely, using olfaction, in clear and turbid (two levels) water. When provided with only a visual cue, or only an olfactory cue, sticklebacks showed a similar ability to detect prey, but a combination of these cues improved their performance. In open-arena foraging trials, a dispersed olfactory cue added to the water (masking cues from the prey) improved foraging success, contrary to our expectations, whereas activity levels and swimming speed did not change as a result of olfactory cue availability. We suggest that olfaction functions to allow visual predators to detect rather than locate prey and that olfactory cues have an appetitive effect, enhancing motivation to forage.
Citation
Johannesen, A., Dunn, A. M., & Morrell, L. J. (2012). Olfactory cue use by three-spined sticklebacks foraging in turbid water: prey detection or prey location?. Animal behaviour, 84(1), 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.024
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Apr 6, 2012 |
Online Publication Date | May 25, 2012 |
Publication Date | 2012-07 |
Deposit Date | Feb 21, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | Feb 21, 2017 |
Journal | Animal behaviour |
Print ISSN | 0003-3472 |
Publisher | Elsevier |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 84 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 151-158 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.024 |
Keywords | Gasterosteus aculeatus; Olfaction; Predator-prey interactions; Three-spined stickleback; Turbidity; Vision |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/448635 |
Publisher URL | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347212001820 |
Additional Information | This is the author's accepted manuscript of an article published in Animal behaviour, 2012, v.84 issue 1. |
Contract Date | Feb 21, 2017 |
Files
Article
(867 Kb)
PDF
You might also like
Building a competence-based model for the academic development of programme leaders
(2023)
Journal Article
Computerized stimuli for studying oddity effects
(2019)
Journal Article
Iterated assessment and feedback improves student outcomes
(2019)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search