Dr Demian Whiting D.Whiting@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer
© 2014 International Union of Psychological Science. Distressing health promotion advertising involves the elicitation of negative emotion to increase the likelihood that health messages will stimulate audience members to adopt healthier behaviors. Irrespective of its effectiveness, distressing advertising risks harming audience members who do not consent to the intervention and are unable to withdraw from it. Further, the use of these approaches may increase the potential for unfairness or stigmatization toward those targeted, or be considered unacceptable by some sections of the public. We acknowledge and discuss these concerns, but, using the public health ethics literature as a guide, argue that distressing advertising can be ethically defensible if conditions of effectiveness, proportionality necessity, least infringement, and public accountability are satisfied. We do not take a broad view as to whether distressing advertising is ethical or unethical, because we see the evidence for both the effectiveness of distressing approaches and their potential to generate iatrogenic effects to be inconclusive. However, we believe it possible to use the current evidence base to make informed estimates of the likely consequences of specific message presentations. Messages can be pre-tested and monitored to identify and deal with potential problems. We discuss how advertisers can approach the problems of deciding on the appropriate intensity of ethical review, and evaluating prospective distressing advertising campaigns against the conditions outlined.
Whiting, D., & Brown, S. L. (2014). The ethics of distress: Toward a framework for determining the ethical acceptability of distressing health promotion advertising. International Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12002
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Jan 21, 2013 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 20, 2013 |
Publication Date | 2014-04 |
Deposit Date | Nov 13, 2014 |
Publicly Available Date | Nov 23, 2017 |
Journal | International journal of psychology |
Print ISSN | 0020-7594 |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 49 |
Issue | 2 |
Pages | 89-97 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12002 |
Keywords | Advertising; Health promotion; Ethics; Distress; Fear |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/471616 |
Publisher URL | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.12002/abstract |
Additional Information | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Brown, S. L. and Whiting, D. (2014), The ethics of distress: Toward a framework for determining the ethical acceptability of distressing health promotion advertising. International Journal of Psych, 49: 89–97. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12002 which has been published in final form at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.12002/abstract. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. |
Contract Date | Nov 23, 2017 |
Article.pdf
(272 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2016 University of Hull
Emotion as the categorical basis for moral thought
(2018)
Journal Article
Doctors' moral beliefs and public policy
(2017)
Thesis
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search