Grant Abt
The validity and inter-device variability of the Apple Watch™ for measuring maximal heart rate
Abt, Grant; Bray, James; Benson, Amanda Clare
Authors
Abstract
Maximal heart rate (HRmax) is a fundamental measure used in exercise prescription. The Apple Watch measures heart rate yet the validity and inter-device variability of the device for measuring HRmax are unknown. Fifteen participants completed a maximal oxygen uptake test while wearing an Apple Watch on each wrist. Criterion HRmax was measured using a Polar T31 chest strap. There were good to very good correlations between the watches and criterion (left: r = 0.87 [90%CI: 0.67 to 0.95]; right: r = 0.98 [90%CI: 0.94 to 0.99]). Standardised mean bias for the left and right watches compared to the criterion were 0.14 (90%CI: -0.12 to 0.39; trivial) and 0.04 (90%CI: -0.07 to 0.15; trivial). Standardised typical error of the estimate for the left and right watches compared to the criterion were 0.51 (90%CI: 0.38 to 0.80; moderate) and 0.22 (90%CI: 0.16 to 0.34; small). Inter-device standardised typical error was 0.46 (90%CI: 0.36 to 0.68; moderate), ICC = 0.84 (90%CI: 0.65 to 0.93). The Apple Watch has good to very good criterion validity for measuring HRmax, with no substantial under- or over-estimation. There were moderate and small prediction errors for the left and right watches. Inter-device variability in HRmax is moderate.
Citation
Abt, G., Bray, J., & Benson, A. C. (2018). The validity and inter-device variability of the Apple Watch™ for measuring maximal heart rate. Journal of sports sciences, 36(13), 1447-1452. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1397282
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | Oct 20, 2017 |
Publication Date | 2018 |
Deposit Date | Nov 30, 2017 |
Publicly Available Date | May 31, 2019 |
Journal | Journal of Sports Sciences |
Print ISSN | 0264-0414 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 36 |
Issue | 13 |
Pages | 1447-1452 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2017.1397282 |
Keywords | Intensity; Validity; Reliability; Technology |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/479678 |
Publisher URL | http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02640414.2017.1397282 |
Additional Information | Peer Review Statement: The publishing and review policy for this title is described in its Aims & Scope.; Aim & Scope: http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=rjsp20 |
Contract Date | Nov 30, 2017 |
Files
Article
(376 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Journal of Sports Sciences on 01/11/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02640414.2017.1397282
Figure4
(440 Kb)
Image
Figure3
(645 Kb)
Image
Figure2
(629 Kb)
Image
Figure1
(642 Kb)
Image
Accepted-clean
(349 Kb)
Document
Copyright Statement
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in Journal of Sports Sciences on 01/11/2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/02640414.2017.1397282
You might also like
Raising the bar in sports performance research
(2022)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search