Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Cost-effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: a simulation modelling approach

Vargas-Palacios, A.; Meads, D. M.; Twiddy, M.; Murray, C. Czoski; Hulme, C.; Mitchell, E. D.; Gregson, A.; Stanley, P.; Minton, J.

Authors

A. Vargas-Palacios

D. M. Meads

C. Czoski Murray

C. Hulme

E. D. Mitchell

A. Gregson

P. Stanley

J. Minton



Abstract

© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. Objectives: In the UK, patients who require intravenous antimicrobial (IVA) treatment may receive this in the community through outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) services. Services include: IVA administration at a hospital outpatient clinic (HO); IVA administration at home by a general nurse (GN) or a specialist nurse (SN); or patient self-administered (SA) IVA administration following training. There is uncertainty regarding which OPAT services represent value for money; this study aimed to estimate their cost-effectiveness.Methods: A cost-effectiveness decision-analytic model was developed using a simulation technique utilizing data from hospital records and a systematic review of the literature. The model estimates cost per QALY gained from the National Health Service (NHS) perspective for short- and long-term treatment of infections and service combinations across these.Results: In short-term treatments, HO was estimated as the most effective (0.7239 QALYs), but at the highest cost (£973). SN was the least costly (£710), producing 0.7228 QALYs. The combination between SN and HO was estimated to produce 0.7235 QALYs at a cost of £841. For long-term treatments, SN was the most effective (0.677 QALYs), costing £2379, while SA was the least costly at £1883, producing 0.666 QALYs. A combination of SA and SN was estimated to produce 0.672 QALYs at a cost of £2128.Conclusions: SN and SA are cost-effective for short- and long-term treatment of infections, while combining services may represent the second-best alternative for OPAT in the UK.

Citation

Vargas-Palacios, A., Meads, D. M., Twiddy, M., Murray, C. C., Hulme, C., Mitchell, E. D., Gregson, A., Stanley, P., & Minton, J. (2017). Cost-effectiveness of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy: a simulation modelling approach. The journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 72(8), 2392-2400. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx123

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Mar 29, 2017
Online Publication Date May 15, 2017
Publication Date Aug 1, 2017
Deposit Date Dec 4, 2017
Publicly Available Date May 16, 2018
Journal Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Print ISSN 0305-7453
Publisher Oxford University Press
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 72
Issue 8
Pages 2392-2400
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkx123
Keywords Pharmacology (medical); Pharmacology; Infectious Diseases
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/484925
Publisher URL https://academic.oup.com/jac/article/72/8/2392/3827870
Related Public URLs http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/115732/
Contract Date Jan 2, 2018