Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Conservation priorities for development: survey of UK public's views on brownfield sites and biodiversity

Macgregor, Callum; Deutz, Pauline; Bunting, Jane; Mayes, William

Authors

Callum Macgregor



Abstract

Policies prioritising the repurposing of abandoned land ('brownfield sites'), in order to spare undeveloped sites, are widely perceived to limit damage to biodiversity. However, brownfield sites can be of significant ecological value, providing scarce habitats, including as a source of greenspace in urbanised areas, and promoting ecological richness at landscape scales. Therefore, policies to promote brownfield site repurposing might do more harm than good in terms of preserving biodiversity, calling into question what the public understand by, and value in terms of, brownfield sites. To examine public opinions relating to the prioritisation of biodiversity in the selection of sites for development, we undertook a survey of 2,247 respondents in the UK. We found that a stigma exists against brownfield sites. Their ecological value is underappreciated, but those who associated brownfield sites with wildlife-related keywords viewed them more positively. Less importance was placed on a site's history of development (brownfield vs undeveloped) than on its actual value to wildlife when considering whether it should be repurposed, and to what use; repurposing to housing or renewable energy production were favoured when sites had little value to wildlife, regardless of whether they had previously been developed. Overall, our results suggest that to best serve the preferences of local people, future planning decisions should consider the current biodiversity value of a site alongside its status as a brownfield site or otherwise. The existing stigma against brownfield sites could be alleviated by outreach and education about the value of such sites to nature.

Citation

Macgregor, C., Deutz, P., Bunting, J., & Mayes, W. (2024). Conservation priorities for development: survey of UK public's views on brownfield sites and biodiversity. People, Place and Policy, 18(3), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.2024.4947649325

Journal Article Type Article
Acceptance Date Nov 19, 2024
Publication Date Dec 20, 2024
Deposit Date Dec 20, 2024
Publicly Available Date Jan 3, 2025
Journal People, Place and Policy
Electronic ISSN 1753-8041
Publisher Sheffield Hallam University
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 18
Issue 3
Pages 135-163
DOI https://doi.org/10.3351/ppp.2024.4947649325
Keywords Abandoned land; Greenspace; Landscape planning; Public perception; Repurposing
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/4966358
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals:

SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities

Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable

SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production

Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns

SDG 15 - Life on Land

Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss

Files

Published article (1.4 Mb)
PDF

Publisher Licence URL
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

Copyright Statement
Copyright: © 2024, Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original author and source are credited.





You might also like



Downloadable Citations