Jason C. Siegler
Sodium bicarbonate supplementation and ingestion timing: Does it matter?
Siegler, Jason C.; Marshall, Paul W.M.; Bray, James; Towlson, Chris
Authors
Paul W.M. Marshall
Dr James Bray J.Bray@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Sport Nutrition & Physiology
Dr Christopher McLaren-Towlson C.Towlson@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Growth, maturation and talent identification of atheletes
Abstract
Although a considerable amount of literature exists on the ergogenic potential of ingesting sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) before short-term, high-intensity exercise, very little exists on optimal loading times before exercise. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of NaHCO supplementation timing on repeated sprint ability (RSA). Eight men completed 3 (randomized and counterbalanced) trials of ten 10-second sprints separated by 50 seconds of active recovery (1:5 work-to-rest) on a nonmotorized treadmill. Before each trial, the subjects ingested 0.3 g•kg-1 3 body weight of NaHCO at 60 (H1), 120 (H2), or 180 (H3) minutes before exercise. Additionally, the subjects were assessed for any side effects (gastrointestinal [GI] discomfort) from the NaHCO ingestion via a visual analog scale (VAS). Blood buffering was assessed using a 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures, whereas repeated sprint performance and GI discomfort were assessed via a 1-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Blood-buffering capacity was not different at preexercise times (HCO-3 [millimoles per liter] H1: 30.2 ± 0.4, H2: 30.9 ± 0.6, H3: 31.2 ± 0.6; p > 0.74). Average speed, average power, and total distance covered progressively declined over the 10 sprints; however, there was no difference between conditions (p > 0.22). The incidence of GI discomfort was significantly higher (p < 0.05) from preingestion at all time points with the exception of 180 minutes, whereas severity was only different between 90 and 180 minutes. Ingestion times (between 60 and 180 minutes) did not influence the blood buffering or the ergogenic potential of NaHCO as assessed by RSA. However, VAS scores indicated that at 180 minutes postingestion, an individual is less prone to experiencing significant GI discomfort. © 2012 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Citation
Siegler, J. C., Marshall, P. W., Bray, J., & Towlson, C. (2012). Sodium bicarbonate supplementation and ingestion timing: Does it matter?. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 26(7), 1953-1958. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182392960
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Publication Date | 2012-07 |
Deposit Date | Oct 24, 2020 |
Journal | Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research |
Print ISSN | 1064-8011 |
Publisher | Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 26 |
Issue | 7 |
Pages | 1953-1958 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182392960 |
Keywords | Blood buffering; Loading protocols; Metabolic alkalosis; Ergogenic |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3565387 |
Publisher URL | https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Fulltext/2012/07000/Sodium_Bicarbonate_Supplementation_and_Ingestion.29.aspx |
You might also like
Nutrition Modulation of Cardiotoxicity in Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review
(2024)
Journal Article
Individualisation of time-motion analysis : a method comparison and case report series
(2014)
Journal Article
Effectiveness of a six-week high-intensity interval training programme on cardiometabolic markers in sedentary males
(2014)
Presentation / Conference Contribution
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search