Skip to main content

Research Repository

Advanced Search

Sodium bicarbonate supplementation and ingestion timing: Does it matter?

Siegler, Jason C.; Marshall, Paul W.M.; Bray, James; Towlson, Chris

Authors

Jason C. Siegler

Paul W.M. Marshall

Profile Image

Dr James Bray J.Bray@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Sport Nutrition & Physiology



Abstract

Although a considerable amount of literature exists on the ergogenic potential of ingesting sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) before short-term, high-intensity exercise, very little exists on optimal loading times before exercise. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of NaHCO supplementation timing on repeated sprint ability (RSA). Eight men completed 3 (randomized and counterbalanced) trials of ten 10-second sprints separated by 50 seconds of active recovery (1:5 work-to-rest) on a nonmotorized treadmill. Before each trial, the subjects ingested 0.3 g•kg-1 3 body weight of NaHCO at 60 (H1), 120 (H2), or 180 (H3) minutes before exercise. Additionally, the subjects were assessed for any side effects (gastrointestinal [GI] discomfort) from the NaHCO ingestion via a visual analog scale (VAS). Blood buffering was assessed using a 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with repeated measures, whereas repeated sprint performance and GI discomfort were assessed via a 1-way ANOVA with repeated measures. Blood-buffering capacity was not different at preexercise times (HCO-3 [millimoles per liter] H1: 30.2 ± 0.4, H2: 30.9 ± 0.6, H3: 31.2 ± 0.6; p > 0.74). Average speed, average power, and total distance covered progressively declined over the 10 sprints; however, there was no difference between conditions (p > 0.22). The incidence of GI discomfort was significantly higher (p < 0.05) from preingestion at all time points with the exception of 180 minutes, whereas severity was only different between 90 and 180 minutes. Ingestion times (between 60 and 180 minutes) did not influence the blood buffering or the ergogenic potential of NaHCO as assessed by RSA. However, VAS scores indicated that at 180 minutes postingestion, an individual is less prone to experiencing significant GI discomfort. © 2012 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Citation

Siegler, J. C., Marshall, P. W., Bray, J., & Towlson, C. (2012). Sodium bicarbonate supplementation and ingestion timing: Does it matter?. Journal of strength and conditioning research, 26(7), 1953-1958. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182392960

Journal Article Type Article
Publication Date 2012-07
Deposit Date Oct 24, 2020
Journal Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Print ISSN 1064-8011
Publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins
Peer Reviewed Peer Reviewed
Volume 26
Issue 7
Pages 1953-1958
DOI https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182392960
Keywords Blood buffering; Loading protocols; Metabolic alkalosis; Ergogenic
Public URL https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/3565387
Publisher URL https://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr/Fulltext/2012/07000/Sodium_Bicarbonate_Supplementation_and_Ingestion.29.aspx