F. Hunter
Individualisation of time-motion analysis : a method comparison and case report series
Hunter, F.; Bray, J.; Towlson, C.; Smith, M.; Barrett, S.; Madden, J.; Abt, G.; Lovell, R.
Authors
Dr James Bray J.Bray@hull.ac.uk
Senior Lecturer in Sport Nutrition & Physiology
Dr Christopher McLaren-Towlson C.Towlson@hull.ac.uk
Lecturer in Growth, maturation and talent identification of atheletes
M. Smith
S. Barrett
J. Madden
Professor Grant Abt G.Abt@hull.ac.uk
Professor of Exercise Physiology
R. Lovell
Abstract
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG. This study compared the intensity distribution of time-motion analysis data, when speed zones were categorized by different methods. 12 U18 players undertook a routine battery of laboratory- and field-based assessments to determine their running speed corresponding to the respiratory compensation threshold (RCT), maximal aerobic speed (MAS), maximal oxygen consumption (vVO 2max ) and maximal sprint speed (MSS). Players match-demands were tracked using 5 Hz GPS units in 22 fixtures (50 eligible match observations). The percentage of total distance covered running at high-speed (%HSR), very-high speed (%VHSR) and sprinting were determined using the following speed thresholds: 1) arbitrary; 2) individualised (IND) using RCT, vVO 2max and MSS; 3) individualised via MAS per se; 4) individualised via MSS per se; and 5) individualised using MAS and MSS as measures of locomotor capacities (LOCO). Using MSS in isolation resulted in 61 % and 39 % of player's % HSR and % VHSR, respectively, being incorrectly interpreted, when compared to the IND technique. Estimating the RCT from fractional values of MAS resulted in erroneous interpretations of % HSR in 50 % of cases. The present results suggest that practitioners and researchers should avoid using singular fitness characteristics to individualise the intensity distribution of time-motion analysis data. A combination of players' anaerobic threshold, MAS, and MSS characteristics are recommended to individualise player-tracking data.
Citation
Hunter, F., Bray, J., Towlson, C., Smith, M., Barrett, S., Madden, J., Abt, G., & Lovell, R. (2015). Individualisation of time-motion analysis : a method comparison and case report series. International journal of sports medicine, 36(1), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1384547
Journal Article Type | Article |
---|---|
Acceptance Date | May 12, 2014 |
Online Publication Date | Sep 26, 2014 |
Publication Date | 2015 |
Deposit Date | Apr 24, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | Apr 24, 2015 |
Journal | International journal of sports medicine |
Print ISSN | 0172-4622 |
Publisher | Thieme Gruppe |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 36 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 41-48 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1384547 |
Keywords | External load, Fitness characteristics, GPS, Match-demands, Soccer, Intensity-distribution |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/372990 |
Publisher URL | https://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0034-1384547 |
Additional Information | Authors' accepted manuscript of an article which has been published in: International journal of sports medicine, 2014, v.36, issue 1 at: https://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0034-1384547 |
Contract Date | Apr 24, 2015 |
Files
Article.pdf
(626 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2015 University of Hull
You might also like
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2024
Advanced Search