John L. Perry
Assessing model fit: Caveats and recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling
Perry, John L.; Nicholls, Adam R.; Clough, Peter J.; Crust, Lee
Authors
Professor Adam Nicholls A.Nicholls@hull.ac.uk
Professor of Psychology/ Leader of the Sport Psychology and Coaching Group
Peter J. Clough
Lee Crust
Abstract
Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is commonly used to assess measurement models in sport and exercise psychology. Frequently used as a yardstick for their adequacy, are specific cutoff values proposed by Hu and Bentler (1999). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether using the CFA approach with these cutoff values for typical multidimensional measures is appropriate. Further, we sought to examine how a model could be respecified to achieve acceptable fit, and demonstrate how exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) provides a more appropriate assessment of model fit. We conducted CFAs and ESEMs on eight commonly used measures in sport and exercise psychology. Despite demonstrating good validity previously, all eight failed to meet the cutoff values proposed by Hu and Bentler. ESEM improved model fit in all multidimensional measures. In conclusion, we propose that researchers abstain from using cutoff values, prefer ESEM to CFA, and generally take a more subjective view towards factorial validity.
Citation
Perry, J. L., Nicholls, A. R., Clough, P. J., & Crust, L. (2015). Assessing model fit: Caveats and recommendations for confirmatory factor analysis and exploratory structural equation modeling. Measurement in physical education and exercise science, 19(1), 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2014.952370
Online Publication Date | Jan 13, 2015 |
---|---|
Publication Date | Jan 2, 2015 |
Deposit Date | May 5, 2015 |
Publicly Available Date | May 5, 2015 |
Journal | Measurement in physical education and exercise science |
Print ISSN | 1091-367X |
Publisher | Routledge |
Peer Reviewed | Peer Reviewed |
Volume | 19 |
Issue | 1 |
Pages | 12-21 |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367x.2014.952370 |
Keywords | Psychometrics, Measurement, Cutoff values, Modification indices |
Public URL | https://hull-repository.worktribe.com/output/373351 |
Publisher URL | http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1091367X.2014.952370#.VUjJb090wzs |
Additional Information | This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Measurement in physical education and exercise science on 13 Jan 2015, available online: http://wwww.tandfonline.com/10.1080/1091367X.2014.952370 |
Contract Date | May 5, 2015 |
Files
Article.pdf
(357 Kb)
PDF
Copyright Statement
©2016 University of Hull
You might also like
Development and validation of the compliant and principled sportspersonship scale
(2014)
Journal Article
Separating the effects of task load and task motivation on the effort–fatigue relationship
(2015)
Journal Article
Stress appraisals, emotions, and coping among international adolescent golfers
(2009)
Journal Article
Mental toughness: managerial and age differences
(2009)
Journal Article
Downloadable Citations
About Repository@Hull
Administrator e-mail: repository@hull.ac.uk
This application uses the following open-source libraries:
SheetJS Community Edition
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
PDF.js
Apache License Version 2.0 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/)
Font Awesome
SIL OFL 1.1 (http://scripts.sil.org/OFL)
MIT License (http://opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.html)
CC BY 3.0 ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)
Powered by Worktribe © 2025
Advanced Search